The Role of Psychological Distance in the Formation of Fairness Judgments

Abstract (via William D. Anderson, Miles Patterson @ Wiley)

The present study examined how communication format, specifically computer-mediated communication vs. face-to-face communication, affected distributive and procedural fairness judgments. Specifically, it was expected that procedural information would have a stronger influence on fairness judgments in face-to-face communication than in computer-mediated communication. This hypothesis was not, however, supported by a significant Mode of Communication × Procedure interaction. We also hypothesized that face-to-face communication, compared with computer-mediated communication, would increase the impact of the distributive information on fairness judgments. As predicted, this hypothesis was supported by a significant Mode of Communication × Outcome interaction. The processes potentially mediating these differences, including psychological distance and evaluation apprehension, are discussed.

Click Here to Read: The Role of Psychological Distance in the Formation of Fairness Judgments

About Miguel Barbosa

I run this site.

29. November 2010 by Miguel Barbosa
Categories: Curated Readings, Psychology & Sociology | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *