Corporate Governance, Firm Valuation & Stock Returns
Interesting paper outlining the “negative association between the G- and E-Index and Tobin’s Q for the 1978-2006 period, even when using firm fixed effects, and little direct evidence for reverse causation.
Click Here To Learn About Corporate Governance, Firm Valuation & Stock Returns
Abstract (Via SSRN)
This paper introduces a dataset tracking approximately 1,000 firms’ G- and E-index scores, as well the individual corporate governance provisions constituting these indexes, over the 1978-1989 period. Combining this data with the 1990-2006 IRRC data, we are able to track firms’ corporate governance over a thirty year period. Most governance changes occurred during the 1980s (with relative stability thereafter). We find a robustly negative association between the G- and E-Index and Tobin’s Q for the 1978-2006 period, even when using firm fixed effects, and little direct evidence for reverse causation. The negative firm valuation effects of classified boards, poison pills and G-Index generally was significantly greater after the judicial approval of the poison pill in 1985, which can be considered as a largely unanticipated, exogenous shock to corporate governance. Moreover, G-Index changes have a much stronger negative association with firm valuation when a firm is in an industry experiencing “high” levels of M&A activity. Finally, we find a robust positive association between “good” corporate governance and abnormal returns for the 1978-2006 period. The abnormal returns association with governance was strongest in the beginning of our 1978-2006 time period and generally declining thereafter, consistent with an explanation of these returns based on the market learning the importance of good governance.
Click Here To Learn About Corporate Governance, Firm Valuation & Stock Returns
